Traces, Metrics, and Costs
Beginner explanation
Traces tell the story of one run. Metrics summarize many runs. Cost tracking shows whether the product economics make sense.
Production explanation
Agentic systems need visibility into model calls, tool calls, retrieval quality, approval pauses, error paths, token usage, and per-task cost. Otherwise debugging and budgeting become guesswork.
Real-world enterprise example
A claims assistant traces every workflow step, including retrieval hit count, tool latency, approval duration, and final model cost. Operations uses this to find slow, expensive, or failure-prone paths.
Mermaid diagram
TypeScript example
export interface TraceRecord {
runId: string;
step: string;
latencyMs: number;
costUsd: number;
error?: string;
}
Python example
def total_run_cost(costs: list[float]) -> float:
return round(sum(costs), 4)
Common mistakes
- storing only the final answer and not the steps that created it
- tracking average latency without percentiles
- ignoring tool cost and retrieval cost in total spend
- no run identifier shared across services
Mini exercise
Design the trace schema for one full workflow run, including IDs, timestamps, step names, and error fields.
Project assignment
Add a trace record format and dashboard metric list to your main project.
Interview questions
- What is the difference between a trace and a metric?
- Which cost signals matter most during early rollout?
- How would you investigate a run that was correct but too slow?
Monetization angle
Observability is part of making AI sustainable in production. It supports platform work, managed services, and enterprise support retainers.